Shop Mobile More Submit  Join Login
About Deviant Core Member Jacob BlausteinMale/United States Recent Activity
Deviant for 8 Years
1 Month Core Membership
Statistics 4 Deviations 11,958 Comments 11,191 Pageviews

Newest Deviations

Favourites

Activity


Another person has banned me. Unfortunately this case is far more cut and dry 
In this link: vexic929.deviantart.com/art/An…
These lies are uttered: "The fact of the matter is, of the staggering 41% of transgender individuals in the United States who attempt suicide and the 59% who do not, all of them have a mental illness that will not be fixed by surgery regardless of whether they attempted before or after transitioning."
The 41% stat comes from a study on trans discrimination.
www.medicaldaily.com/41-transg…
The suicides are due to discrimination.
She then says: "Stop giving them surgery. They’ll hate you for it, they’ll hate me for telling you this, but just like any other patient with body dysmorphia they cannot be allowed to have this surgery because it will not be the end-all-be-all answer to their problems and has been shown to even cause more problems."
This is debunk by one of her own sources!
www.hemingways.org/GIDinfo/BDD…
"far, you may be thinking that Gender Identity Disorder sounds pretty much like the same thing. But, again, one of the key differences is the fact that BDD responds to psychopharmacology, whereas GID does not. Treatment for BDD often involves the use of SSRI medications like Sertaline or Fluoxetine. Furthermore, psychotherpy is often successful in convincing the BDD sufferer that their perceptions are distorted. Those with GID are rarely convinced they are mistaken. GID (especially "transsexualism") also often manifests during early childhood, rather than during adolescence.
This comparison demonstrates why it is so VITAL that a person seek psychiatric care from a therapist well-versed in treating gender problems. A non-specialist may erroneously believe someone with GID is suffering from BDD. This could lead to the administration of drug therapies that are unnecessary and will be ineffective, and attempts to dissuade the person from seeking "surgical correction" for their problem. It is standard practice in treating BDD to convince sufferers that surgical procedures are not necessary, whereas those people properly diagnosed as "transsexual" under GID benefit greatly from surgical procedures."
Such intellectual dishonesty from vexic929 is staggering.
The fact she links to Paul Mc Hugh's wasteful wsj article is just silly.
www.transadvocate.com/clinging…
Friends, please go to this person and call her out on this dishonesty.
Hello friends. The following is me being petty, making public a private manner (even though none of the linked DA comments are hidden)but the party I am talking about banned me, so I can't really confront him.
Here is Tohokari-Steel: tohokari-steel.deviantart.com/
And here is part of something he said to me here: comments.deviantart.com/1/5313…
"but since your skull seems to made of solid concrete, the blatantly obvious seems to have escaped you, 'cuz YOUR PWECIOUS FEEWINGS GOT HURT!"
Someone feels angry, and I admit that it's partly my fault, as he kept telling me to leave him alone, but I kept poking the bear as it were.
Still...
"
1. Uses SJW sites as references. Admits to getting upset over small things. Claims to not be an SJW."'
Apparently when I say things like:
"
As for the rest of the movement, when the Escapist caved to their demands and revised their ethics policy, they immediately violated their own policy with an article that presented itself as neutral but sourced game developers from GamerGate itself, including one who had been openly calling for criminal activity against developers he didn’t like, andone that had been backed by Alexander Macris, co-founder of the Escapist. Additionally, GamerGate continues to list the Escapist as “one of the good ones” in spite of this, ignoring the fact that, in addition, the Escapist published an article promoting a game owned by co-founder Alexander Macris without disclosure.

Wasn't the movement about not doing things like this?
Tell me: Could you explain why gamergate, which is supposidly pro-gamer and ethics is willing to support Jack Thompson, a dude who literally tried to take games away and got disbarred over ethical issues.
And what about GamerGate’s support of Milo Yiannopoulos  despite allegations of corruption and actively hating on gamers ...my favorite moment being when he also jumped in to harass Brianna Wu after the death of her dog (Classy)
And here is some more: medium.com/@poopsockholmes/the…

And here is the kicker of this article "Fun fact, these guys are tweeting at actual, unapologetic Holocaust denier (and popular#Gamergate streamer) @Kingofpol." storify.com/turnoffthenews/gam…
Too add to the hypocritical NeoNazi support here is Hotwheels: www.dailystormer.com/hotwheels…
When has fighting for ethics involve gross hypocrisy?"
Apparently he can just ignore these without checking the sources and the evidence like an unbaised person would, because they apparently come from 'sjw sites', and tar me with the 'sjw' brush
Oh and pointing out such blatent hypocrisy apparently means that I "[admit] to getting upset over small things" 
Next: "2. Oh, guys! I just wanted to say this on behalf of little, baby Ryu! He's tired of us saying mean, nasty things about him! He is a delicate flower and we should all be SUPER NICE to him!" Yes I am apparently a baby because someone told a very blatant lie about me, I wanted tto set the record straight, and he ignored me instead of admitting that he made a mistake and was wrong.
comments.deviantart.com/1/5313…
"
Honestly, I don't think even RYU knows his rant is barely connected to the topic at hand. I speak from experience. He's all but a Social Justice Warrior."
comments.deviantart.com/1/5313…
"
He did this in another thread I started. He tried to make it about something connected to the topic and not about the topic itself."
And here is where steel nods along without checking to see if he was telling the truth.
comments.deviantart.com/1/5313…
Let's go a little ahead to where I gave my evidence: comments.deviantart.com/1/5313…
"
I just don't like how you bought Zucca's lies about me. Would you like it if someone made a false claim about you and the person he told it too accepted it even though no evidence was given?
Hell this is what I told him here when he claimed that I was off topic here: comments.deviantart.com/1/5164…
"But we were talking about gamergate. A lot of what I said was about it. It's an open forum about people's thoughts on the subject. And my mistake doesn't invalidate my points on the subject so please put it back up."
And off course he once censored me: comments.deviantart.com/1/5164…
And when I called him on it he politley said "
I've been actually censored by individuals on DA. Hidden and permanently blocked."
comments.deviantart.com/1/5164…
I should note that he blocks me now..."
So yeah my feeling were hurt because someone outright lied about my character. Wouldn't you?
I should note that the blocking is the reason I went to Steel...when I shouldn't have really bothered. 
I admit that when he dismissed me again, I responded in a very harsh manner: comments.deviantart.com/1/5313…
Still when he said this:
"
But no, better to just be an over-sensitive little baby. And, since I have no interest in explaining to a baby that I'm not interested in what it has to say about me, I shall proceed to block you. Run along, little baby Ryu. Go home, cry, play with your toys, or whatever it is children your age do." And this sounds like he's not being over sensitive? I can't help but feel that he's self projecting a little. 
So why do I bring this up? Well Steel was kinda of a tool, and I don't like how he was trying to act like the better man. I don't like hypocrisy. I know he might try for a reprisal but I am not one to be quiet, for better or worse. And I admit that this is for my ego. 
This is my response to this comment comments.deviantart.com/1/5313…
Don't ask why I couldn't respond there, but here we are.
wiki.gamergate.me/index.php?ti…

Well I know that this article (www.deviantart.com/users/outgo…) is about that GameJournoPros...and it's about journalists not wanting to get into the private life of one their subjects??? Interesting but let's have some context to why they would say that...
Oh and before we go on, the author Milo Yiannopoulos has a history of ethical issues , please remember that when you read this quote from his article, oh and he is actively hating on gamers  too:
"High-profile editors, reporters, and reviewers from heavyweight gaming news sites such as Polygon, Ars Technica, and Kotaku use the private Google Groups mailing list, which is called Gaming Journalism Professionals or GameJournoPros, to shape industry-wide attitudes to events, such as the revelation that developer Zoe Quinn had a sexual relationship with at least one prominent games journalist — a journalist who had mentioned her and her products in his reporting." Follow this link and he does mention her...
"A reality TV show about some of the best indie game developers in the business competing Iron-Chef-style to make amazing games? Sounds like a great idea, right? You'd think so, but this story does not, unfortunately, have a happy ending.

According to a report on Indie Statik (and corroborating testimonials from Depression Questcreator Zoe QuinnSoundSelf maestro Robin Arnott, and traveling indie of all the hats Adriel Wallick), GAME_JAM was originally conceived as an attempt to give wider audiences an inside look at what a game jam - that is, a rapid-fire game creation process, usually done over the course of a few days as a creative exercise - is actually like.

Having participated in a few myself, I can add that it's a stressful and difficult but exhilarating process. And in many ways, game jams really get to the heart of what modern "indie" game development is all about: small teams, off-the-wall ideas, and sloshing gallons of blood, sweat, and tears."
...huh you know clicking that I expected a review of her game but it looks more like he reporting on a reality game show Quinn just happened to be on....hmmm you know I thought that Briebart article was going on to something like "Oh she's so sleeping with him to get a good review..."
...hmmm let's look further
"So the idea checked out, but what developers and YouTubers (who were also involved, much to some developers' surprise) discovered when they got there was apparently a far cry from what they signed on for.

Filming allegedly happened last week, with the process ending when everyone walked off set in outright refusal to have anything more to do with the show after Pepsi consultant and Protagonist CEO Matti Leshem repeatedly attempted to sir up drama. Apparently, production company Polaris (a subsidiary of the now-Disney-owned YouTube network Maker) dropped somewhere in the realm of $400,000 on the project. It was even sponsored by Pepsi/Mountain Dew.

So then, what happened? To hear the developers tell it, intense contract negotiations were the first sign that something was amiss.

"From the beginning there were potential problems with the 'Green Label Game Jam' (branded on set as 'GAME_JAM')," wrote Wallick in her testimonial." Wallick? What about Zoe? I thought the article was linked to in order to show the conflict of interest between Zoe and Nathan? Hell that article seems to focus solely on Wallick's testimony...
This link: wiki.gamergate.me/index.php?ti… does the exact same thing...


Perhaps we should hear what at least one of the guys in the GameJournoPros have to say:
"So flash forward to that GameJournoPros email thread where The Escapist Editor-in-Chief Greg Tito was allowing a forum thread about Zoe Quinn's sex life to thrive; keep in mind that this was roughly at the same time that Quinn was saying that she was being doxxed, and regularly receiving harassment and death threats on social media. Nude photos of her were also leaked all over the Internet." 
Stop! The nude claim is true: twitter.com/alexlifschitz/stat…
"Aug 18 17.37.57 <SweetJBro> lol I’m tweeting Zoe’s nudes to some of her defenders. "
"Aug 21 23.20.35 there should be a massive campaign to tweet zoe her own nudes …
Aug 21 23.21.01 <Silver|2> They’ve been tweeted at her a lot" (see here: puu.sh/boAEC/f072f259b6.txt)
Remember that as we go on:

"Seeing Greg (by all accounts a fairly new and untested EIC) faced with such a tough decision, I offered my advice - "don't allow that thread to flourish." Allowing a thread about Zoe Quinn's sex life and repeating an accusation that wasn't true wasn't fostering discussion - it was throwing gasoline on an already untamable inferno.

As someone who moderates a community (with a ton of help from Andrew Eisen!) I could see the potential hazards of allowing such a conversation to flourish because even Reddit and 4Chan were starting to kill these threads. You know something is too toxic and might have legal ramifications when 4Chan, an imageboard whose off-limit topics could be counted on a few fingers of one hand, decides that a subject should be banned.

As everyone knows now, Greg didn't see a problem with the thread, despite me pointing out in that email conversation that it was a violation of the site's terms of use. He disagreed with that, and while I thought he made the wrong decision, I let it go. Other people had stronger opinions about it and voiced them. That was pretty much the end of it until the very first email leak from GameJournoPros over at Breitbart. It would be the first of many leaks that would try to accuse members of the GJP list of everything from corruption and collusion to group think on the whole GamerGate discussion."

www.gamepolitics.com/2014/10/1…


"Kotaku themselves confrimed Zoey Qunin sleeping with one of their developers"
archive.is/8KjOG
Let's see what they say "The allegations have been extreme. Nathan has been accused of in some way trading positive coverage of a developer for the opportunity to sleep with her, of failing to disclose that he was in a romantic relationship with a developer he had written about, and that he'd given said developer's game a favorable review. All of those are troubling claims that we take seriously. All would be violations of the standards we maintain. Having spoken to Nathan several times, having looked closely at the numerous messages sent our way by concerned readers and, having compared published timelines, our leadership team finds no compelling evidence that any of that is true. 

P
On March 31, Nathan published the only Kotaku article he's written involving Zoe Quinn. It was about Game Jam, a failed reality show that Zoe and other developers were upset about being on. At the time, Nathan and Zoe were professional acquaintances. He quoted blog posts written by Zoe and others involved in the show. Shortly after that, in early April, Nathan and Zoe began a romantic relationship. He has not written about her since. Nathan never reviewed Zoe Quinn's game Depression Quest, let alone gave it a favorable review. P

Given the information available to us both from Nathan and all sources presented online, I have no reason to believe any further action need be taken. The situation is fraught for all involved, including our readers, whose trust is paramount; inquiry is always welcome."
In other words, yes she has a relationship with Nathan, no she did not sleep with him to get a good review...like you seem to imply. Nice try. 
Guess who confirms this: "There was a typo up for a while that made it seem like Zoe and I were on break between March and June. This has apparently led some people to infer that her infidelity with Nathan Grayson began in early March. I want to clarify that I have no reason to believe or evidence to imply she was sleeping with him prior to late March or early April (though I believe they’d been friends for a while before that). This typo has since been corrected to make it clear we were on break between May and June. To be clear, if there was any conflict of interest between Zoe and Nathan regarding coverage of Depression Quest prior to April, I have no reason to believe that it was sexual in nature." thezoepost.wordpress.com/
So the guy who started this whole mess admits that he was wrong about one of his accusations...I should note that before hand his word about her sleeping with other dudes was law, so for him to admit that he didn't have any evidence for one guy implies that he doesn't have much evidence for her sleeping around with him.
Like he guy here themalesofgames.blogspot.com/2… 
"The fact is that Grayson was in a position to help Quinn and who knows if he talked about positive coverage for her game behind the scenes?" No one knows and neither do you. Prove that Nathan did do what you claim he did. Until then take your conspiracies somewhere else. At least he has enough intellectual integrity to admit that they didn't sleep together. 

Unlike this guy: www.returnofkings.com/42109/ho…
"So was Eron an asshole who couldn’t handle Zoe’s rad self? Is that why Zoe screwed a video game journalist named Nathan Grayson, writer over at Kotaku, in order to get positive press for herself and her projects, thereby making more money for herself? She sure as hell bent to Nathan’s will. She sure as hell treated Eron like shit, despite claiming she wasn’t someone who did that."
...say Mr.Chubbs is it? Where did you get your information.

"Recently, a simpish man named Eron Gjoni was dumped by his girlfriend Zoe Quinn. The reason? Eron found out Zoe was cheating on him. As Eron explains it in his very long, very detailed diary entry about the whole affair" 
OH I see, and an ex-boyfriend is such an honest source!...idledillettante.com/2014/12/06…
Here are some choice comments
Please read this entire link and tell me that Zoe's ex was unbiased in any way
Here are some good quotes from it:
"He spent weeks crafting it and sharing drafts with close friends of his, weighing the pros and cons of this course of action. His mom even told him not to post it, although Eron didn’t take her advice.

Gjoni knowingly shared the so-called “zoepost” with 4chan hours after it went live. I know this because the post originally contained this welcome message for 4chan traffic. Eron’s since changed his TL;DR; this is the original header to his tell-all post.
idledillettante.files.wordpres…

This directly contradicts Eron’s later narrative that 4chan simply happened to find his postings. He promoted them on the site; I know how this works because I own a blog myself. To be clear, this is the OP of the 4chan thread Gjoni’s talking about."
"It’s important to note that Zoe Quinn had been harassed by channers in the past. Eron knew this had happened, which encouraged him to seek out this community as an audience for his writings. His intent with thezoepost seems to have been to destroy Quinn personally and professionally as an act of revenge. This next message (which Eron posted on Twitter and later deleted) suggests he even wanted to break her psychologically."
twitter.com/TheQuinnspiracy/st…
twitter.com/TheQuinnspiracy/st…
So a man who claims to have not supported the harassment...was involved in it...can we really trust this guy?

Back to TheMalesOfGames also attacks other people with little evidence "The first person in the conversation, Wolf Wozniak, claims that Zoë Quinn sexually harassed him and Phil Fish, developer of Fez, inadvertantly confirms it" No Phil pointed out that Wolf crashed the party, which proves he was there, but it takes a leap of illogic to claim that it proves his claims of harassment. And then he trashes mister Fish for apparently covering up something...and instead of providing evidence of the sexual assault Wolf whines and leaves...

You know I am beginning to think your articles have some bias. Can I call them garbage, like you called mine? At least I show the reasons I believe your articles are biased, instead of just saying they are.

"
The article also covers the Fine Young Capitalist controversy...which is a good way to lead into another of your claims!

"Zoey Admits to doxing that same Feminist charity
archive.is/DnAlm Acutally, looking around she defends herself...and later proves that she didn't do any doxxing: 
imgur.com/a/KEtcp
Even gamergate knew! twitter.com/TheQuinnspiracy/st… See here for confirmation: puu.sh/boAEC/f072f259b6.txt
"On December 3, an article on The Amherst Student, a college student newspaper, was released by William Harvey. Its tone is fairly neutral, and seriously talked about both the perceived harassment and corruption both sides present." Neutral?
"The Gamergate fiasco began after the ex-boyfriend of game developer Zoe Quinn released detailed chat logs proving that Quinn had slept with multiple gaming journalists for positive press towards her independently produced game, “Depression Quest.”Other facts about Quinn’s unethical behavior, such as having a follower hack and destroy a rival charity gaming session, came to light." After everything I've written, can you call that fairly neutral?!?! They don't even go to investigate to see if these claims are true!

Now...let's stop a moment and take a breath...right now I have debunked two big things: Her shutting down a feminist charity, and the claims of her sleeping with at least one person.

Now the things that are true:
"During the initial stage of GamerGate, many discussions were censored.

Certain video game publications, journalists, and developers had locked many discussion forums about GamerGate. Threads pointing out examples of journalistic impropriety on third-party websites such as reddit or 4chan were deleted." Geez you give alot!!! If any of these are true (I am not going to go and check each one thank you very much, I don't have that much time to kill) then you have my deepest apologies...
Wait...

I mean you post a fake chatlog to support your claim of real censorship? Not helping your case....
"Any discussion on the Zoe Post itself mysterious shut down by censorship"
Are you reffering to this? thezoepost.wordpress.com
Now you are not really helping your case.

"Also do tell me if  Zoey Qunin is innocent, why did she DMCA Mundane Matt's video on GamerGate." OK that was bad form for Zoe for that one, even if some of the claims in that video are bull. You got me there. 
From the gamergate wiki "On March 19, 2014, Ben Kuchera, senior editor at Polygon, published an interview with Quinn that focused on the harassment she claimed to have received from Wizardchan, and, overall, portrayed her in a positive light.[98] It was not disclosed at the time of the interview that Kuchera had been giving money to Quinn via Patreon since January 6, 2014.[99] and that Philip Kollar, a deputy review editor at Polygon,[100] had been doing the same thing since January 9, 2014.[101]" A legit case of Conflict of Interest...Though to be frank it feels like one of those stopped clock kinds of things. A large chunk of the wiki's page on conflict of interest is on poor Grayson...which I have shown to not be as big a case as they like to think it is. 

"sheild to cover up corruption and make any criticism about the corruption in gaming journalism into a issue of sexism which makes you a disingenuous sexist." How nice of you to say..let's look at your sides ethics shall we?
I've all ready pointed out how gamergate though sending nude photos of Zoe was a good idea.
Here is a new one from the ex: "Eron Gjoni was promoting this libel on October 8, directly linking to Malorie’s accusations in this series of tweets." idledillettante.files.wordpres…
More info on that found here: idledillettante.files.wordpres…
Where it discuss bullshit claims made about Zoe...
More false claims: twitter.com/TheQuinnspiracy/st…

As for the rest of the movement, when the Escapist caved to their demands and revised their ethics policy, they immediately violated their own policy with an article that presented itself as neutral but sourced game developers from GamerGate itself, including one who had been openly calling for criminal activity against developers he didn’t like, andone that had been backed by Alexander Macris, co-founder of the Escapist. Additionally, GamerGate continues to list the Escapist as “one of the good ones” in spite of this, ignoring the fact that, in addition, the Escapist published an article promoting a game owned by co-founder Alexander Macris without disclosure.
Wasn't the movement about not doing things like this?
Tell me: Could you explain why gamergate, which is supposidly pro-gamer and ethics is willing to support Jack Thompson, a dude who literally tried to take games away and got disbarred over ethical issues.
And what about GamerGate’s support of Milo Yiannopoulos  despite allegations of corruption and actively hating on gamers ...my favorite moment being when he also jumped in to harass Brianna Wu after the death of her dog (Classy)
And here is some more: medium.com/@poopsockholmes/the…
And here is more hypocrisy...a harsh word yes but what do you call this?:
"

  1. #Gamergate zeroed in on Cheong early on, dredging up private chatlogs in which Cheong, then a teenager, made inflammatory, over-the-top anti-Semitic jokes such as "Hitler is my idol." Cheong, now in his 30's, has apologized and apologized for the remarks.
  2. #Gamergate, though quick to accept the apologies of its heroes Milo Yiannopoulos and Mike Cernovich for much more recent transgressions, cannot or will not process Cheong's apology. Any article he writes, or is even mentioned in, is flooded with accusations that he is a literal, present-day Neo-Nazi.
  3. What these brave anti-racist soldiers fail to realize is that they are usually addressing Arthur Chu."
And here is the kicker of this article "Fun fact, these guys are tweeting at actual, unapologetic Holocaust denier (and popular #Gamergate streamer) @Kingofpol." storify.com/turnoffthenews/gam…
Too add to the hypocritical NeoNazi support here is Hotwheels: www.dailystormer.com/hotwheels…
When has fighting for ethics involve gross hypocrisy?

Back to BurgerAndFries
"Aug 21 17.23.31 <sarahv> The problem is that making it about Zoe sleeping around amounts to a personal attack which, while funny and something she totally deserves, will hurt our chances of pushing the other point …
Aug 21 17.23.38 <rd0951> ./v should be focused on the implications of gaming journalism …
Aug 21 17.23.47 Because SJWs will cherry-pick the /b/ shit posting and say “See? It’s sexist MRAs!”"
One day Later...
"Aug 22 02.02.46 <CutestGAmerGorl> Okay guys, how much does Zoe like being choked
Aug 22 02.02.49 <CutestGAmerGorl> during sex? …
Aug 22 02.02.58 <sarahv> clearly not enough"
twitter.com/TheQuinnspiracy/st…
Ad nausem...or should it be ad Nausea....
And this is related to ethics in gaming journalism how?
"Do tell me if Zoey Qunin is innocent, why is there such a need to censor her affair?" You mean like when you say:
"Any discussion on the Zoe Post itself mysterious shut down by censorship"
Sorry after a whopper of a lie like you just gave me, I am done. 
Before I go please remember this: "twitter.com/TheQuinnspiracy/st… (and yeah check here for it: puu.sh/boAEC/f072f259b6.txt)
Remember that when you say things like "Why does Gamerghazi wish to go on a mass censorship campagin on her behalf" I don't know...but looking at what you do have, you don't have much of a case against her either way. 
And doing the things found here: storify.com/a_man_in_black/gam…
here: storify.com/alexlifschitz/the-…
here: storify.com/MadScientist212/th…
and here: storify.com/a_man_in_black/gam…
medium.com/@poopsockholmes/the…
doesn't helps your side's case.
Another person has banned me. Unfortunately this case is far more cut and dry 
In this link: vexic929.deviantart.com/art/An…
These lies are uttered: "The fact of the matter is, of the staggering 41% of transgender individuals in the United States who attempt suicide and the 59% who do not, all of them have a mental illness that will not be fixed by surgery regardless of whether they attempted before or after transitioning."
The 41% stat comes from a study on trans discrimination.
www.medicaldaily.com/41-transg…
The suicides are due to discrimination.
She then says: "Stop giving them surgery. They’ll hate you for it, they’ll hate me for telling you this, but just like any other patient with body dysmorphia they cannot be allowed to have this surgery because it will not be the end-all-be-all answer to their problems and has been shown to even cause more problems."
This is debunk by one of her own sources!
www.hemingways.org/GIDinfo/BDD…
"far, you may be thinking that Gender Identity Disorder sounds pretty much like the same thing. But, again, one of the key differences is the fact that BDD responds to psychopharmacology, whereas GID does not. Treatment for BDD often involves the use of SSRI medications like Sertaline or Fluoxetine. Furthermore, psychotherpy is often successful in convincing the BDD sufferer that their perceptions are distorted. Those with GID are rarely convinced they are mistaken. GID (especially "transsexualism") also often manifests during early childhood, rather than during adolescence.
This comparison demonstrates why it is so VITAL that a person seek psychiatric care from a therapist well-versed in treating gender problems. A non-specialist may erroneously believe someone with GID is suffering from BDD. This could lead to the administration of drug therapies that are unnecessary and will be ineffective, and attempts to dissuade the person from seeking "surgical correction" for their problem. It is standard practice in treating BDD to convince sufferers that surgical procedures are not necessary, whereas those people properly diagnosed as "transsexual" under GID benefit greatly from surgical procedures."
Such intellectual dishonesty from vexic929 is staggering.
The fact she links to Paul Mc Hugh's wasteful wsj article is just silly.
www.transadvocate.com/clinging…
Friends, please go to this person and call her out on this dishonesty.

deviantID

ryu238
Jacob Blaustein
United States

Comments


Add a Comment:
 
:iconlordmep:
lordmep Featured By Owner Jan 26, 2015  Hobbyist Writer
Do you still live?
Reply
:iconryu238:
ryu238 Featured By Owner Jan 27, 2015
Yes
Reply
:iconlordmep:
lordmep Featured By Owner Jan 27, 2015  Hobbyist Writer
Just checking.
Reply
:icongodofwarlover:
godofwarlover Featured By Owner Oct 5, 2014
I thought we all agreed that no one is going to upload anything by Fiskefyren since he blocks those who disagree with him and now someone uploaded something by him into the group
Reply
:iconryu238:
ryu238 Featured By Owner Edited Oct 5, 2014
Oh yeah...ok I will get rid of it.
Reply
:icongodofwarlover:
godofwarlover Featured By Owner Oct 5, 2014
Alright
Reply
:iconryu238:
ryu238 Featured By Owner Oct 5, 2014
Just done it...shame, it fit our group well too.
Reply
(1 Reply)
:iconkajm:
Kajm Featured By Owner Aug 2, 2014  Hobbyist Writer
Just wanted you to know, the current ControversyInc journal entry by an-archangel, is not worthy of the group. I believe you two are attempting to find common ground.... that journal is an insult to all decent people, the person who wrote it is not decent people, and I hope NO decent person responds to it.
Reply
:iconryu238:
ryu238 Featured By Owner Aug 2, 2014
Just read your comment (been busy 2day) Do u want me 2 delete it?
Reply
:iconkajm:
Kajm Featured By Owner Aug 2, 2014  Hobbyist Writer
No. Let it stand as a monument to intolerance posing as an enlightened appeal to reason  *g*
Reply
Add a Comment: